The fundamental contradictions in Giuliani’s erratic interview with The Washington Post – ThinkProgress
[ad_1] On the heels of his disastrous interview with Sean Hannity , Rudy Giuliani did another with The Washington Post . This one got somewhat less attention, but was just as problematic for his client. The most important thing for Giuliani to establish is that Michael Cohen’s payment to Stormy Daniels was not a campaign contribution. But in the Washington Post interview, Giuliani provided more evidence to the contrary. Giuliani told a muddled story about the payment to Daniels. While he repeatedly insisted that that money ultimately came from Trump’s “personal funds” and that Cohen and Trump “never considered this a campaign payment,” at another point he admits that he’s doesn’t know if Trump “distinguished it from other things Cohen might have done for him during the campaign… I don’t know that he distinguished it from other expenses that Cohen had for which he had to be reimbursed.” By acknowledging that Trump lumped the expense with other explicitly campaign-related expenses, ...